What the Election Means for The Merchant Cash Advance Business
- Larry Reid
- Oct 31, 2024
- 2 min read
Updated: Nov 3, 2024
Next week, the United States will finally vote for the next president, potentially shifting the political and economic landscape. For the merchant cash advance (MCA) industry, the outcome could bring significant changes.

How the Election Might Affect the MCA Industry:
Tax Policies and Business Borrowing
Trump: Plans to extend the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) and reduce corporate taxes, potentially boosting profitability for small businesses. This could lead some companies to seek traditional financing over MCAs, though demand for short-term capital may remain steady.
Harris: Likely to implement progressive tax policies, increasing the burden on corporations and high-income earners. This may lead businesses to turn to MCAs for quick capital to manage tighter cash flows.
Regulatory Environment
Trump: Emphasizes deregulation, reducing compliance costs and encouraging entrepreneurship, which could lead to more MCA opportunities.
Harris: Advocates for stronger oversight, possibly raising compliance costs and impacting MCA operations.
Tariffs and Supply Chains
Trump: Proposed tariffs could disrupt supply chains, driving businesses to seek MCAs to handle working capital needs. However, this could also increase risk if businesses struggle to manage cash flow.
Harris: Aims to stabilize trade through alliances, potentially reducing volatility for businesses but increasing regulatory burdens, which could sustain MCA demand in some sectors.
Interest Rates and Capital Costs
Trump: Potential changes in Federal Reserve leadership could lead to lower interest rates, encouraging businesses to seek traditional loans over MCAs.
If interest rates stay high, MCAs will continue to be an attractive option for small businesses struggling to access bank loans.
Consumer Spending and Business Revenues
Trump: Focus on tax cuts and energy expansion may boost consumer spending, benefiting small businesses.
Harris: Investments in healthcare, education, and environmental programs may shift MCA demand to sectors experiencing growth.
In essence, Trump’s pro-business and deregulatory stance could benefit MCA providers, while Harris’s focus on oversight and progressive policies might lead to a more challenging environment. The MCA industry will need to adapt depending on the election outcome to thrive in a post-election landscape.
Comments